Actor
portrayal.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) analyses

Together, randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence may help inform healthcare clinical practice16-21

RCTs: Gold Standard

Interventional studies

  • Gold standard for evaluating efficacy and safety of new drug treatments according to the FDA16,17
  • Designed to eliminate systematic biases when comparing drug treatments16

Limitations

  • Due to highly specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, RCT results may not be generalizable to the broader patient population in clinical practice17
  • May not be able to address questions that require large patient populations or when ethical or time constraints exist16,17

RWE: May Complement RCT Findings

Observational, non-interventional

  • May use data from routine clinical practice18
  • RWE is clinical evidence about the usage and potential benefits or risks of a medical product derived from analysis of real-world data. Real-world data are data related to patient health status and/or delivery of health care18,19
  • May include a broader, more heterogeneous patient population and, therefore, may be more generalizable16,18,20,21

Limitations

  • Unable to determine causality18,21
  • Biases related to treatment selection and unobserved variables cannot be fully addressed16,18
  • Other limitations include limited internal validity, potential data quality, and/or methodology issues16,18,20,21

Observational RWE analyses are not intended for direct comparison with clinical trials and may introduce bias.18,20