Actor
portrayal.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) analyses

Together, randomized controlled trials and real-world evidence may help inform healthcare clinical practice15-20

RCTs: Gold Standard

Interventional studies

  • Gold standard for evaluating efficacy and safety of new drug treatments according to the FDA15,16
  • Designed to eliminate systematic biases when comparing drug treatments15

Limitations

  • Due to highly specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, RCT results may not be generalizable to the broader patient population in clinical practice16
  • May not be able to address questions that require large patient populations or when ethical or time constraints exist15,16

RWE: May Complement RCT Findings

Observational, non-interventional

  • May use data from routine clinical practice17
  • RWE is clinical evidence about the usage and potential benefits or risks of a medical product derived from analysis of real-world data. Real-world data are data related to patient health status and/or delivery of health care17,18
  • May include a broader, more heterogeneous patient population and, therefore, may be more generalizable15,17,19,20

Limitations

  • Unable to determine causality17,20
  • Biases related to treatment selection and unobserved variables cannot be fully addressed15,17
  • Other limitations include limited internal validity, potential data quality, and/or methodology issues15,17,19,20

Observational RWE analyses are not intended for direct comparison with clinical trials and may introduce bias.17,19